| Gord'n VOW
Rules, principles, giving all back to the tax payers, should be a 'must' for
any
civil servant. It is not what people really feel. It is not a portrait of
anyone in
particular, however, it is based on a top civil servant who had 40+
free-weekends
with one
type of minority, the one that pays the highest taxes. Wrong? Evidently not!
Only, if I were rich, I would not have any personal interest to invite him.
Gord'n ROW
Populism always backfires. I became protective of this personage I never heard
before but when he
became
a political scapegoat. Any political persecution, I know it very well, has to
be fought against, it
doesn't matter where it comes from. The portrait is based on several published
photos.
Gord'n DROWN
The one that is all the time smiling to the bosses, polishing his/her shoes,
but in
the end, behind the meekness of the smile, there is a greedy self, re-enforcing
the bad
as much
as the good. The reality is different, so why not an angry very grumpy
one? No one posed for this one.
Gord'n BOW and Gord'n DOWN
Both Darlings, one based on a TV series and the other one very real. They are
the
good and the bad conscience portrayed in many cartoons.
Is one of them
too bad not to be listened? Is the real one too bad he has to CONFORM all the
time? Both are painted from memory.
Conformism is one of the human traits that explains a good part of the
human social
behaviour. There are
exceptions out there, rare but influential.
Gord'n CROWN
It seems Gord'n CROWN does not listen. He has a mission, he has the power, but
he failed by being
the leader in a period when, having all the tools, even the opportunity to have
well-guided use of
computers or his trusted knowledge of the 1929 crash, and all the other
minor or bigger well documented crises
before and after that crash. Couldn't he remember the lawful separation of two
antagonist bank functions then-after?
The human GB could have (but he did not) led all of us to an easier inevitable
20XX crisis.
Instead, why did he conform with the de-regulation of those bank functions?
Why did he not reverse them?
Why did GB not have time to listen to the isolated voices, not drunken by
power, warning him of the dangers?
Please... do not wash your hands!
The portrait is Brown himself, based on various non-published
images.
Gord'n POUND
What to say about what in this complex world rules almost everything for good
or bad? Ok, not the pound really, but it still has a close 'saudade' to one's
heart. The portrait is
of a loved person, based on several photos.
Gord'n CLOWN
Professional artists should respond to the demands of the times, having
comissions, working for others, discussing with their patrons. They should make
a living out of their work, as workers, and the contractors surely should be
sure of what they wanted.
Free paintings, art for the art sake, or amateurs like me, can paint whatever
they want, but in this case we have to expect the poverty of the demand (if we
put our works in the market).
Right or wrong, as soon as coins take the place of art, it is dificult to say
what's good or not, currency is artless. If the greedy rich buy art for the
sake of the investment, then, only those who do not buy or appreciate art
through its nominative price can enjoy each work of art. 'Poor' means all, rich
or poor, who value the creation or the message, even the decorative side.
Everyone wears a mask. It is the trend that puts values in value or absence of
value. Sad not to live in times of hope and love! Can't wait for good
music! It will come, one day.
What about Right or Wrong, Good or Bad (the trivial not the prescriptive
gulps)?
The majority sees all being measured in coins, many putting
permissiveness on the social side, instead of the private side of life. It is
also
the eternal fight between HAVE and BE.
It is not a particular
clown but it is good to remind masks are one of the universal culturally
creations of human beings.
| Gord'n ADAM and Gord'n EVE
The old myths representing the first humans are part of the myths and mysteries
pervadingthe first years of conditioning behaviour of a good part of the
humanity .
These original sinners cannot run away of the
responsibility of their acts and
its meaning. More, without flesh, Adam and Eve cannot blame others and less
washing their hands
when things go wrong (well, and blame others). After being happily perfect
(love had not been invented beyond flesh, as such), they came
down to the real world, invented the first shoes, and they had to work as an
independent team. Valid for all, even for those who want it all, read my words,
any independence brings
losses and gains (good or bad, painful or pleasurable).
Please, let myths (and heros) not be real humans, at least still alive. The
last one in
the spotlight was a tiger in a fresh burnt savannah, now he is a tiger in a
secluded forest. No one, including photos, were the models
for these two vain myths.
Gord'n GOWN
A former university colleague told me that the last modern things are the superior things. Then he said why his faith, which had been created 500 years after a Roman governor washed his hands, was the superior of the only big three, the only ones really valid.
His ideology was the most petrol-dollars active and dominant, the one that was conquering the world, winning all battles, including the ideological. He end up, together with a small group of other colleagues who then had joined up the 'discussion' (I was silent), commenting about the decadence of the western society.
Somehow, to my concern, some of the western colleagues, clearly not part of the same propagandistic fallacies but converted to this show of power, sympathised with them.
Who is this personage painted so simplistically, and with such a large confident smile? This personage that hides all but her feelings? Gowns and masks are not so different, masks probably for certain occasions, cellebrations, (pantomines use masks), etc.
It is everyone believing in a future on Earth, with probably a connection with
the paradise. It is any man or woman who fights action with re-action, in a same
power
struggle, with both sides apparently on a flat basis (if the fight is not
declared).
Who this figure can be? Most Christian Europeans used to wear not long ago
head-covers, and some, like Catholics in Nazareth, Portugal, would wear black
clothes,
covering the body completely and most
of the face with the exception of the brown eyes (some say now it was a myth
propagated by a former dictatorship).
More, on our doorstep we can still see the past in the 'Sevillanas', or the
defensive or
battling mark of the uniform in nuns and nurses. Some monks use hoodies and
brown rough clothes to convey the message of humiliaty. He sends the message
but no one knows if the carrier is really humble. In the old days even some
prisoners
would achieve redemption if they were not visible to the society by using a
full head cover.
The best trait about culture is that it is dynamic (it
changes). It is better not to confuse culture (behaviour) with immutable
ideologies
(that
influence culture at very early ages though).
If political interference is not an issue, head covers, whatever form they
come in, are also
still being used today by many people and in many
cultures (including small groups or gangs) or because, like me, to avoid the
scary frost. And I can see a bald woman using a head cover because she does not
like wigs.
Between the past and the present, some women
had to use head covers to protect themselves from the dryness and scorching
Sun, but once submissive to
an ideology (that modifyied their behaviour by creating myths), they forgot the
function of those covers in the first
place.
Evidently, whatever ideology or fashion, the majority of women do
not wear them nowadays.
However, if ideological confrontation needs symbols of political resistance
many will wear that skin, and many have already
adopted these symbols as such, rigidly. They became a diffused point of
political
power-struggle.
The greatest mass
murderers I knew in Africa were the greatest smilers/laughers. This is
the connection, a big smile can be part of no-empathy linked with many
psychopaths, or the incensed feeling of considering 'the others' (tribes, etc)
as no humans.
It is necessary to represent the greedy side of both sides, with or without
head covers.
Gord'n FROWN
The only vibrating human figure (together with the hand) pointing to the human
charade, also the human condition, and his/her particular
future.
|